Conclusion Myocardial protection with intermittent blood cardioplegia is clinically safer procedure.

结论间断冷血灌注心肌保护法在临床上更为安全.

互联网

On the other hand, AP could not provid an adequate myocardial protection for the occluded LAD region.

相反, AP对梗阻LAD区心肌不能提供足够的心肌保护.

互联网

Objective : To evaluate the myocardial protection of changing temperature blood cardioplegia for heavy valve replacement.

目的: 探讨变温含血停跳液对重症心脏瓣膜置换的心肌保护作用.

互联网

Objective To evaluate the myocardial protection of warm blood cardioplegic induction during cardiopulmonary bypass ( CPB ).

目的评价在体外循环中常温含血停搏液诱导心肌停搏的心肌保护作用.

互联网